Fazly vs Mirror
Two face-rating apps, four dimensions that actually differ.
Mirror is one of several AI face-rating apps that arrived after the category was established, and like most of them it returns a score and a breakdown from a model you cannot inspect. Fazly's difference is not that its model is better — that is not a claim anybody in this category can support — but that its arithmetic is visible. Every measurement carries the distance it measured, the target it was scored against and the weight it contributes; the face-shape verdict shows the four ratios behind it and the margin over the runner-up rather than a fabricated confidence percentage. The eleven browser tools also run entirely on your device with no account, so you can measure something before deciding whether any of this is for you. Check Mirror's own site for its current features and pricing.
Which one is for you
Choose Fazly if
You do not trust a number you cannot check, and you want to try the measurements before installing anything.
Choose Mirror if
You want a single polished app experience and are not interested in the working behind the numbers.
What they do better
Simplicity. A single score with no ratios underneath it is easier to read, and for a lot of people that is the right trade.
What Fazly does, dimension by dimension
| Dimension | Fazly |
|---|---|
| Where your photo is processed | The free tools run Google's MediaPipe face mesh as WebAssembly in your browser. The image is never transmitted — there is no upload endpoint for it, which you can confirm in your browser's network tab. The app uploads scans, and any scan can be deleted. |
| Whether you can check the number | Every tool shows the measurement, the target it was scored against, and the weights behind the composite. The face-shape detector shows the four ratios that produced its verdict, so you can disagree with it on the evidence. |
| What it costs to try | The eleven browser tools are free and need no account, no email and no install. The app is free to download and free to scan; Pro adds the full breakdown, the roadmap and a new scan every week. |
| Languages | Five, fully: English, Turkish, German, Spanish and Portuguese. Not a machine-translated shell — the tool copy, the bands and the questions are written in each. |
| What the scores claim to be | Distances from a stated convention, said so on every page. Fazly does not claim its targets are findings about attractiveness, because they are not. |
This page states what Fazly does, which is checkable from this site. It does not list the other app's prices or features, because those change and a comparison page that is wrong about a competitor is worse than no comparison page at all — check their own site for their current answer.
Questions
Do these apps use the same technology?
Most face-rating apps build on a facial-landmark model and score the geometry it produces; Fazly uses Google's MediaPipe face mesh and says so. The differences between them are in which measurements they take, what targets they score against, and whether they tell you.
Why do two apps give me different scores?
Because they score against different targets and weight them differently, and almost none of them publish either. Fazly publishes both, which is why its score is arguable rather than merely different.
Is a higher score from one app more accurate?
No. A score is a distance from whatever convention that app chose, so comparing scores across apps compares the conventions rather than the faces. The only cross-app comparison that means anything is whether each one tells you what it measured.
Or skip the comparison and measure something — free, no account:
open the free tools